I am totally for net neutrality. I think that looking at different things such the telephone and television a person can start to understand the difference between the two, and the advantage of having the internet be equal.
With telephones it is rather easy to get good and cheep telephone provider plans. My brother and dad go back and forth telling each other about lower and lower plans. With televisions I think it is much different. Usually it is very hard to get a decent television bill because only a few companies are able to compete for your business. To get basic cable with about 40 or 50 channels it's around 40 dollars.
That's why I think the internet must be kept open. It isn't right to have a large company dictate terms between another large company and decide in essence how many people choose a product or a web site based on how fast it goes. I think that is an unfair advantage. What is really bothersome about the topic is that in large newspapers and websites that the focus is on the politics about the issue and not resolving the issue. Most articles are full of statements by congressmen about "how they feel" and statistics who voted how. I want to know about net neutrality. For the general public this mostly is out of their consciousness because it is out of their interest and that is troublesome with some as special as the Internet.
