In nearly all things it's the governments right and responsibility to protect our safety before protecting most our freedoms. Therefore cybersquatting for purposes of fraud are wrong and should be taken down or changes. I think that companies that intend to deceive people and trick them into giving them money when aren't that company need to be shut down. One example that I am aware of is the governments financial aid website for the FAFSA. There are many websites that are look a likes of FAFSA and for a family that doesn't regularly use FAFSA it can be tricky find the real one. The concern should be websites like this that scam money from hard working people.
Some should be all to obvious. Anyone that doesn't know virizonsucks.com is not a part of Verizon should not be allowed to touch a mouse ever again. This leads to the argument about the right to protest. I feel that a group or person should be able to voice their protest and concern about any business that they want to online. People protest all the time here downtown in San Francisco in front of big stores like Macy's and likewise should be allowed to do it on the Internet.
Also any large company that isn't willing to pay someone fro the name of the business website that they want doesn't have the right to bring it to court. If Sears doesn't get sears.com and some guy in Pickiniy, Idaho then that man has the right to keep it or sell it as he wishes. What if that mans name was Steve Sears. He would have the right to keep the name as long as he wants to and he would have a lot of hits that would find out when his family reunion is.
