
I don't really think file sharing is a bad thing. It is an offense to laws that are in place but I don't think that the goal of making music should be to make tons of money. For the small artists that make try to make a name for themselves a little pirating of their music can only hope to spread them and make them bigger names.
I've downloaded some music before from P2P networks like Kazaa and Limewire and never really though much of it. Most of the bands I downloaded are really well known and have been played tons of times. Recently I downloaded "Home, Home on the range." Songs like this have been played so many times that the originally artist isn't really the one gaining from the sale of it. Big companies, like Virgin Records, advertiser, like Yahoo, and distributors, like Apple, are. For those small struggling artists it is not the reality that can and always will be broken. I feel for those people but don't think they will be much worse off without my financial support. For those making great music must of them already have what they need to do it.
From a different prospective If had the talent to make music I would want it to be open source. I would want anyone to take keep it and give it to others. I think that music is going to be much the same way the Internet is in the future because the ethical practice of regulating music distribution is impractical. Advertisements will be all over free legitimate p2p systems. Artists will make their money based on how many downloads they get and everyone will make money. For virtual things like music movies the Internet and software their is no practical way to regulate their distribution.
To me the serious ethical dilemma is what kind of music we are being exposed to. Today most of the highest selling records all are totally shameless. Tons of rap songs and rock song don't hold any values that Americans should be proud of. So lets not get angry at people downloading songs illegally, lets mad at what kind of detrimental behavior they are endorsing when they do.